<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Perthshire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kozerawski.com/2007/08/03/perthshire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kozerawski.com/2007/08/03/perthshire/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 23:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Maksymus007</title>
		<link>http://www.kozerawski.com/2007/08/03/perthshire/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Maksymus007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 13:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kozerawski.com/2007/08/03/perthshire/#comment-33</guid>
		<description>I mean not instead of current, but additionally - fe. link for higer resolution images under post? Because lots of pictures containt details, invisible or not-enought-visible in currect resolution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mean not instead of current, but additionally - fe. link for higer resolution images under post? Because lots of pictures containt details, invisible or not-enought-visible in currect resolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.kozerawski.com/2007/08/03/perthshire/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 17:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kozerawski.com/2007/08/03/perthshire/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Though I have all of them in high resolution, that is not the idea of that blog. My photos are usually prepared for 1024x768 - but they are smaller of course (to left space for toolbars, task bar etc.). I know that some people got much higher resolution on the screen, but high resolution pictures would have looked bad when part of it had been out of the screen, and at the same time I am absolutely not convinced to the automatic change of the picture resolution in every web browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though I have all of them in high resolution, that is not the idea of that blog. My photos are usually prepared for 1024&#215;768 - but they are smaller of course (to left space for toolbars, task bar etc.). I know that some people got much higher resolution on the screen, but high resolution pictures would have looked bad when part of it had been out of the screen, and at the same time I am absolutely not convinced to the automatic change of the picture resolution in every web browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maksymus007</title>
		<link>http://www.kozerawski.com/2007/08/03/perthshire/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Maksymus007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 17:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kozerawski.com/2007/08/03/perthshire/#comment-31</guid>
		<description>it is possible to get pictures in better size? I mean can you post them in higer resolution?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is possible to get pictures in better size? I mean can you post them in higer resolution?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

